Why it matters
If an agent's credentials can already reach another customer's records, prompt injection isn't the vulnerability. It's the trigger. Close the authorization gap and the injection has nowhere to go.
Agents don't reach data directly. They reach it through APIs, using an identity you issued. So the first question is a classic application-security question asked from a new seat: what can this identity actually do?
apisec tests the APIs behind your agents from the agent's own scope and token: broken object-level authorization, broken function-level authorization, object ownership, tenant isolation, and privilege boundaries, run against the running application.
If an agent's credentials can already reach another customer's records, prompt injection isn't the vulnerability. It's the trigger. Close the authorization gap and the injection has nowhere to go.
The request sequence, the identity used, the data returned, and a replay.
Every step passes its own review. The chain is the breach. apisec runs it end-to-end and shows you the whole path.
apisec uses models to reason about your agents and to generate attacks. It does not use a model to decide whether an attack worked. Execution is the arbiter: deterministic, repeatable, replayable, auditable.
That matters more here than anywhere else you run. A system that behaves differently on every invocation cannot be governed by a tool that behaves differently on every invocation.
The free Surface tools produce what you need before an exploit run.