APIs serve as the backbone for connecting services, enabling communication, and allowing users to interact with systems. However, with great power comes great responsibility, especially when it comes to API security. Peloton, a leader in fitness technology, faced a significant security breach that highlighted two crucial vulnerabilities in its API infrastructure: Broken Authentication and Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA), both ranked in the OWASP API Security Top 10.

This breach serves as a stark reminder of the importance of proper API authentication and authorization mechanisms to protect sensitive user data and maintain user privacy. Let’s explore the breach, its causes, and the lessons it offers for API security.

What Happened: Peloton's API Vulnerability

In this case, Peloton exposed an API endpoint without proper authentication. Essentially, anyone who could find this endpoint could access it, regardless of whether they were authenticated or not. The researcher who discovered this flaw was able to access the user database, which included over 4 million users' records.

Not only was the authentication completely missing, but the authorization logic was flawed as well. Even users who had set their profiles to be private, ensuring their data wouldn't be visible to others, had their information exposed. This was due to a lack of proper authorization checks, allowing access to private data regardless of the user’s privacy settings.

While Peloton eventually added authentication to the API, the core authorization issue wasn’t fully addressed. This left all 4 million user records vulnerable, even though users were now required to authenticate. The flaw was that authenticated users still had access to all the records, regardless of the data sensitivity or ownership.

This is a textbook example of OWASP API Security Principle #1 (Broken Object Level Authorization) and #2 (Broken Authentication), where weak authentication mechanisms and insufficient authorization checks led to the exposure of sensitive data.

‍

Broken Authentication vs. Broken Object Level Authorization

‍

To understand the severity of this breach, let’s break down the two vulnerabilities involved:

‍

Broken Authentication:

Authentication is the process of verifying the identity of a user or system. Peloton’s API lacked proper authentication controls from the start, allowing unauthorized access to its endpoints. This flaw meant that anyone who found the endpoint could potentially access sensitive information without proving who they were. Check out our blog on Fixing Broken API Authentication to understand it a little better.

‍

Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA)

Even after Peloton added authentication to its API, the authorization system was still broken.
Authentication only confirms who the user is, authorization controls what that user is allowed to do or see.

In Peloton’s case, the API didn’t properly enforce those limits. That meant even though users were logged in, User A could still access User B’s private data. The system failed to check whether the authenticated user actually owned the data being requested.

Because of that gap, a single API endpoint exposed all user records, including sensitive profile details.
This is a textbook example of Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA) the “Can User A see User B’s data?” problem that sits at the top of the OWASP API Security risks.

Real-World Implications: Data Exposure and Privacy Violations

‍

The Peloton API breach serves as a wake-up call for the fitness and tech industries alike. Exposing sensitive personal data not only puts users at risk of identity theft but also results in a loss of trust. In Peloton’s case, this breach revealed users’ private information, including details they specifically chose to keep private.

‍

The consequences of such breaches are far-reaching:

‍

• Privacy Violations: Users who trusted Peloton with their data were betrayed by the company’s inability to secure it properly.
• Regulatory Risks: Peloton could potentially face significant fines and sanctions under data privacy laws like GDPR or CCPA, which mandate strict data protection measures.
• Reputation Damage: Losing consumer trust can have a lasting impact on a brand’s reputation, especially in a competitive market.

‍

This breach serves as a stark reminder of the critical need for proper authentication and authorization checks in APIs. Companies must ensure that their security protocols are robust enough to protect user data and privacy at all stages.

‍

How APIsec.ai Can Help Prevent Similar Breaches

To prevent breaches like the Peloton API vulnerability, it’s essential to implement robust authentication and authorization mechanisms. APIsec.ai, a leading API security testing platform, can help organizations automate and streamline the process of detecting vulnerabilities like broken authentication and BOLA.

‍

APIsec.ai provides continuous API security testing, ensuring that your authentication protocols are strong, authorization logic is correctly implemented, and sensitive data is properly protected. With automated testing, businesses can catch flaws early in development, reducing the risk of exposing sensitive user data.

Key benefits of using APIsec.ai include:

• Automated vulnerability detection for authentication and authorization flaws.
• Integration with CI/CD pipelines to detect issues before deployment.
• Continuous monitoring to ensure APIs remain secure in production.

‍

By integrating APIsec.ai into your API development process, you can proactively prevent security breaches and ensure your APIs are secure at every stage of the development lifecycle.

“APIs Aren’t Hidden: Why ‘No Authentication’ Is the Biggest Mistake Developers Make.”

‍

Lessons for API Developers: Preventing Broken Authentication and BOLA

The Peloton case is a reminder that APIs are never truly hidden. Attackers actively look for exposed endpoints, test them for access, and exploit any that skip security steps. In Peloton’s case, some endpoints had no authentication at all meaning anyone could access them without logging in. That’s not weak security; that’s no security.

Here’s what every API team can learn from it:

1. Never assume your APIs are invisible

Many developers think internal or “undocumented” APIs can’t be found. In reality, attackers use tools to map out endpoints and try them directly. Always assume your APIs will be discovered and protect them accordingly.

2. Implement strong authentication

Every API that touches user or business data must require authentication. Don’t skip it because you think no one knows the endpoint exists. Use secure, proven methods like OAuth 2.0 or multi-factor authentication (MFA) for sensitive operations.

3. Enforce authorization

Once a user is authenticated, verify what they’re allowed to access or modify. That’s where most breaches happen. Remember the golden rule of BOLA: “Can User A see User B’s data?” If yes, your authorization model is broken.

4. Follow least privilege

Give users only the access they need, nothing more. Limit tokens, scopes, and permissions so no single key or account can see everything.

5. Test continuously, not occasionally

Manual reviews miss logic flaws. Automated testing platforms like APIsec.ai simulate real attacks including no-auth endpoints and BOLA scenarios to find gaps before attackers do. Regular testing keeps APIs secure as your code changes.

Conclusion

The Peloton API breach didn’t happen because someone guessed a password; it happened because some APIs didn’t require one at all. Once authentication was added, authorization remained broken, allowing User A to access User B’s private data, the hallmark of BOLA.

For developers, the takeaway is simple:
Don’t assume your APIs are hidden, and don’t rely on obscurity as protection. Every endpoint that can be reached must be secured.

By combining strong authentication, strict authorization, and continuous automated testing through tools like APIsec.ai, organizations can close these gaps before they become headlines.

FAQs

1. What caused the Peloton API breach?
The breach happened because some of Peloton’s API endpoints had no authentication at all. Anyone could access them without logging in. This exposed private user data and proved that APIs thought to be “hidden” can still be found and exploited by attackers.

2. What is Broken Authentication in APIs?
Broken authentication occurs when an API doesn’t properly verify who’s making a request or skips authentication entirely. Without login checks, anyone can act as a legitimate user and access sensitive information.

3. What is Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA)?
BOLA happens when an API doesn’t confirm that an authenticated user actually owns the data they’re trying to view or modify. In short: “Can User A see User B’s data?” If yes, that’s a BOLA flaw.

4. Why is assuming your API is “hidden” a mistake?
Attackers use automated scanners to find APIs, even ones not publicly documented. Thinking your APIs are “safe because no one knows about them” is one of the biggest security myths. Every accessible endpoint should be secured as if it’s public.

5. How can developers prevent broken authentication and BOLA?
Always require authentication, check authorization for every request, and apply least privilege principles. Regularly test APIs using automated tools that simulate real-world attack patterns to catch gaps early.

6. How does APIsec.ai help prevent these vulnerabilities?
APIsec.ai doesn’t just scan, it simulates real attacks. It automatically creates test scenarios where User A tries to view, modify, or delete User B’s data, helping teams detect and fix Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA) issues. It also flags endpoints missing authentication entirely, proving whether your “hidden” APIs are actually secure.

‍